昭和６２年北里大学医学部卒業。形成外科、一般外科、整形外科、麻酔科、救命救急科等広い分野の診療を手がける。平成９年北里研究所病院形成美容外科医長、茅ヶ崎徳洲会総合病院形成外科・美容外科部長を歴任。平成１０年４月より銀座美容外科副院長として父子で美容外科診療に携わる。
平成２０年４月より銀座・いけだクリニックの顧問医師に就任。
＜資格・免許＞
- 医学博士
- 日本形成外科学会認定専門医
- 日本美容外科学会専門医
- 世界美容外科学会正会員
- 日本美容医療協会正会員
- 平成２０年４月銀座いけだクリニック顧問医師に就任
The “impact” of the London Women’s March is its most debated and elusive political metric. It cannot be measured solely by crowd size, which is an input, not an output. True political impact is measured in changed conversations, shifted policies, altered electoral behaviours, and the empowerment of a sustained opposition. The immediate impact is often atmospheric—a dominating of the news cycle, a surge in social media traffic, a temporary shift in the cultural mood. This is real but ephemeral. The long-term impact is infrastructural: did the march help build lasting organizations, identify new leaders, or solidify networks that endure? The political challenge is that impact is often diffuse and delayed, making it difficult to attribute directly to the march itself. Opponents will inevitably declare it had none, while organizers will claim it shifted the landscape. The most honest political assessment lies in the intermediate zone: the march creates a concentrated moment of political potential. It is a catalyst. Whether that catalytic potential is realized depends almost entirely on the work done in the days and weeks that follow to harness its energy. Without that follow-through, the impact is confined to the symbolic realm. With it, the march can become a turning point in a longer campaign.